If Mr. Obama has done nothing else, he
has been able to help America discover the answer to an old
children's riddle: which came first, the chicken or the egg? The
problem, of course, is simple enough. The egg comes from chicken,
but the chicken starts out as a hatchling from an egg.
The answer can be found in Obama's rant
against business owners. You know the one; "you didn't build that." In that
speech, Obama suggests that business owners didn't build their
business, because they use government roads and bridges, and had
teachers as children, and used other government facilities along the
way.
Obama bootstraps that argument as
support for higher taxes on successful earners. Not, by the way, on
the unearned income of the truly wealthy, but only on successful wage
earners. Such people, he says, should be happy to give a little bit
back.
To say the argument is disingenuous is
charitable, to say the least. The first and obvious fallacy is that
murderers, thieves, and drug users often have been to school, driven
on roads, and used many of those same government facilities. While
the availability of good schools and roads may promote the success of
business, it hardly guarantees the success of a business, and never
really causes business to occur, any more than schools and
roads cause murder, robbery, or drug abuse.
The second, less obvious fallacy is
rooted in the fact that governments don't actually have money; they
have collected money to build the roads and schools, to pay the
teachers and to operate any other facilities by levies of taxes. And
those taxes aren't paid by the murderers, thieves, or drug users, but
by the successful wage earners, and usually not the truly wealthy.
So to say the successful wage earner needs to "give a little
back" when their taxes paid for it in the first place is just
absurd.
There are two other important points.
It is true that in every society there are disabled and needy, but
their care is not per se a government responsibility, but a
societal choice between government and private charity. Also, while
government may choose to finance projects by debt, that is not
relevant, since debt repayment is also premised on taxes on the wage
earners.
American history, which liberals ignore
and Obama may not even know, clearly shows that business precedes
government. People came to the New World, set up farms and
businesses, and then created a government, and build schools and roads to service those farms and businesses.
Which answers the old question of which
came first, the chicken or the egg. Without the chicken (the
taxpayer) the government would never have its golden egg. In other
words- government, "you didn't build that", the taxpayer
did.
No comments:
Post a Comment